|
|
[ Cruise Reviews ] [ Port Reviews ] [ Cruise Chat ] [ Cruise Links ] [ News ] |
|||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
Victoria Ruehl
Age: 41 to 50
I like this ship but would not recommend the QE2 to new cruisers or those who
want glitz, glamour, partying or sophistication. To me,
the QE2 is like a stately home - holding onto elegance but shabby and worn around the edges; trying
maintain the old standards, ambience, and service but having a hard time.
To enjoy this ship, you need to appreciate her history and what traveling by sea used to
mean. No one area (e.g. food, entertainment, cabins, etc.) are spectacular, but the
overall effect is understated elegance and refinement.
One of the pluses of a ship designed for crossings is that there are lots of
lounges and places to sit on a rainy day. The Yacht club & Crytal Bar are particularly nice to
curl up with a book next to a window and watch the waves. There
were always people reading, doing needlework, or talking in the chairs in & around the Queens
Room. The most recent re-fit made a huge difference in
the public areas - jewel tone carpets (lots of teal, royal blue & gold) are coordinated with
upholstered chairs and drapes; rich wood paneling (lighter than mahogany but darker than oak)is
liberally used in the public areas, as are attractive marble-look sconces and lighting fixtures.
Brass detailing abounds. The ship finally has an
elegant, consistent look throughout the public areas.
The decks are wonderful aged teak - no astroturf/fake grass on the QE2!
The Boat (promenade) deck is wide enough for people to sit at the rails in teak deck chairs,
while leaving plenty of room for walkers or joggers. Depending
on the weather, you can walk all around the ship, but the front portion requires going up stairs,
across the bow, and down stairs onto the other side. When
very windy, the stairs are closed. The pool deck is shielded from the wind with glass panels and is
always quite crowded. The pool is very small (no laps
here!). The Sun deck is much emptier as it involves
several flights of stairs and can be breezy.
Depending on the itinerary, there may not be enough deck chairs.
On this trip 1,200 of the passengers were on for one month and it was sunny and warm every
day, so there were fights for deck chairs. (I avoided
this by going to the Sun Deck and reserving a chair for $17...well worth it.) If there are lots of
sunworshippers, as there were on this trip, it's difficult to get away from the crowd on deck.
It's rows and rows and rows of deck chairs, all squeezed together.
(That's where the Sun Deck comes in handy.)
The casino seemed empty - with 10 out of 14 days "sea days", I was
surprised that the casino was so underused. I don't
know why. Nights were busier, but still not like on other ships.
The Grand Lounge, where the main evening entertainment is, has added seating, but in less you
get there early and get seats in the first 15 rows, you'll be in the back with columns blocking some
views. I stood in the back most nights, or sat along
the sides where I couldn't see a thing, but could listen.
On QE2, the location/price of your cabin determines which of the restaurants you
eat in and I was in Caronia which is single seating. I've
never been particularly impressed with the food on the QE2 - it's fine, better than average but not
great. This trip I thought the food was better than before. For
dinner, the menu was not huge - 3 appetizers, soup and pasta courses, 4 entrees (at least 1 fish -
often 2) and 3 desserts. It's hard to please everyone,
but only once or twice were there two entrees that really appealed to me.
The appetizers were very traditional and seemed dull - lots of fruit cups, melon w/ham, etc. I often had the pasta course for my appetizer.
Entrees were traditional too, but more interesting (maybe it was the vegs and sauces that
redeemed them). I don't normally eat much beef, but I
did here - not so many chicken or veal choices which is a shame.
The beef was good, but always served as a steak or filet.
(No beef burgundy, for example.) Desserts were
adequate - nothing great at all.
Service was basically good; once or
twice, extremely slow and when I canceled a course, great consternation arose.
One of the men at the table had problems with getting his steak or lamb cooked correctly -
their version of medium rare was grey throughout. Instead
of whisking it away w/apologies, the waiter argued/explained before taking it away.
Overall, it was fine - not great, but not bad.
I had breakfast and some lunches in the Lido, since the buffet is quicker than
the restaurant and I eat less. Generally, I liked the food in the Lido (see the "Public Areas" section
for my comments on the physical aspect of the Lido). Breakfasts
were standard fare - hot & cold cereals, eggs, sausages/bacons, beans, tomatos, fried potato
cakes, toasted breads, pastries, and waffles. Food was
hot and tasty. For lunch, they offer a salad bar, cold
cuts/cheeses, hot dishes, a carvery plus desserts. Several
days had a curry (lamb, beef, chicken, shrimp) which was wonderful; "ye olde englishe pub" day had steak & kidney pie, bangers &
mash, roast beef & yummy Yorkshire pudding (among other items). The rice pudding seemed to be a
very popular dessert, as was the apple crumble with sauce. Service
was fine - waiters usually carried trays to tables for the more tottery passengers and would get
whatever beverage you wanted. Because I usually
couldn't find a table, I would sit on a bar stool (bar was closed).
The waiters didn't know how to handle this - most ignored me until I finally flagged one down
for my water. But, not a big deal since I know I was
out of the norm.
Overall, the food in the Lido was pretty good - it was just a shame that I could
never find a seat and that it was so hot and noisy.
The Pavilion Cafe is a spot many passengers never discovered - just a small grill
off the pool. Hotdogs, hamburgers, minute steaks,
mini-salad bar, soup and a special daily grilled item (ribs, german sausage, chicken cutlets, etc.)
This was very quick and I often got food here and brought it up 5 decks to the Sun
Deck.crowds by going late but it was inevitably hot, stuffy and so LOUD.
Never had a pleasant relaxing meal in there.
Overall, public areas are good - inside there's lots of daylight, plenty of
comfortable chairs and attractive decor; outside the decks are well maintained but you have to stake
out your turf if you want a chair and some space around it.
I was in a single, Caronia class cabin (there are only 8 on the ship).
Bathroom was nice - deep tub and shower. Closet
space was tight, but there were plenty of drawers. Safe
and fridge in closet (safe is a new addition and very nice - on other voyages, it was inconvenient
to traipse off to the lock boxes.) As part of the refit, all cabins got new matching drapes, bedspreads and
upholstered chairs (my color scheme was burgundy and cream, others were green/cream, gold/cream,
blue/cream). THis was a long overdue improvement. Beds now have a duvet and down-filled pillows - comfy, but the duvet was hot.
The QE2 doesn't have high powered air conditioning (again, built for crossings) so the room
didn't get very cool - I never used the duvet, just a top sheet.
(Some other people mentioned the same problem.)
Unlike most other ships of today, where cabins are modular units, on the QE2 the
cabins vary widely in size, shape and layout. On
disembarkation day, I looked at 4 of the other Caronia single cabins and each was different from
mine. Two had lighter wood (much better) and a
different layout w/more closet space. I also looked at
many other cabins in other price categories, and there were huge differences within a given category
(some have little entry/hall ways, walk in closets, dressing table with lighted mirror and seat,
light wood, dark wood, and on and on - an amazing variety). I
don't believe any travel agent would know the differences and I doubt that Cunard reservation agents
would know the layout of specific cabins. So, it's
potluck as to what you get and how pleased you are with it. What
I always do is check them out on disembarkation and make a list of cabins I'd like on a future
cruise.
In general, the cabins are smaller and less luxurious than on other ships and the
fittings (built in items such as dressers, nightstands, etc.) are dated/worn.
I don't expect much from on-board entertainment - after all, if the performers
were really good, they'd be on Broadway or at least Las Vegas!
And the QE2 has never had very good entertainment and this trip was no exception. They had a theatre group "Broadway Bound" on board and they were pretty
sad - couldn't sing, couldn't dance and not very sociable. One
headliner was awful; I've never heard so many negative comments (and from British people, who are
usually so polite!) They didn't like her costumes (one
was completely see through over her breasts which was NOT popular at all) and her repertoire was
totally wrong for the audience ('70's & '80's songs for a clearly Gershwin/Porter/Clooney
audience). No audience reaction, people walking out or
not clapping at all. She was the featured entertainer for two nights and you'd think that she would
have caught on and changed, but NO. Very small audience
anyway and those who came left early. A complete
contract was a West End performer who entranced the audience. Personable, good singer, appropriate songs.
Her second night performing was standing room only. Other
nights had the usual mixture of magician (another horrendous show - I've truly never seen such a bad
magician; his wife did an act & she was even worse
than him - people thought it was a spoof, but when their laughter got the wrong response, we
realized...) An Irish comedian who was funny and the crowd loved him; the crew talent show -
very, very popular with the passengers and some were better than a few of the paid entertainers.
Same old stuff, nothing memorable except the West End performer and the awful magician.
Dance hosts:
This is another area where I don't expect much, but if you like to dance and are looking
forward to dancing with these men....buyer beware. As
on most ships with hosts, these hosts were elderly (the newest was 83) and they don't dance well.
In fact, two of them just shuffled around the floor, regardless of whether it was a cha cha
or a waltz. Of the other two, one did his own version
(he limped) and the other was a decent dancer. I think
that most dance hosts are saving their energy, so don't expect much!
The cruise staff was supposed to supplement the hosts, but they weren't there much (showed up
and danced once or twice, then left, and showed up again just before the band stopped for the
night). However, the band was great, the Queens Lounge
is very sociable and the dancing can be entertaining to watch.
Plus, plenty of couples were having a grand old time. Even
with hosts, it's still the best ship for dancing.
Lecturers:
This is an area where QE2 excels. They always
have interesting, polished speakers whose area of expertise appeals to the passengers.
In the past, I've listened to well-known authors, newsmen, restauranteurs, actors, etc.
On this trip, we had a famour London newspaper editor, the royal florist who lectured on the
British royal family, a naval architect, a wine expert and some one else. Even with great weather, lectures were well attended and had lots of
questions/answers. Another nice thing Cunard does is
videotape all the lectures and show them throughout the day on the television.
The lecturers were knowledgeable, animated and were very sociable around the ship.
Cruise staff:
Never saw the cruise director (Les Rolinson) at all.
He didn't walk around the ship, didn't introduce all the entertainment - he wasn't a presence
at all. On other ships (and QE2 previously), everyone
knew who the cruise director was! Some of his staff
were very hardworking and never had a moment to chat (running various games, setting up activities,
etc.) but the social hostess (Maureen Ryan) was superb. Very gracious - she took time to speak with as many passengers as possible and
truly listened to them. She was extrememly popular with
the passengers. On the other hand, the social host
(Michael) was aloof, snide and actively avoided passengers. So, it all depends on who they hire!!
There always seem to be a wide range of activities on board.
On sea days, I played team trivial pursuit, went to dance class and a lecture. Trivial pursuit had between 100-130 participants and was well run - no arguments
about answers allowed and most teams were pretty serious. Dance
classes were large too, but it was amazing how the instructors could teach so many people a variety
of steps in 45 mins. Very social and a good way to meet
people. There were bridge, needlework, arts/crafts,
etc. get togethers too which all seemed to have a following.
The on deck sports activities were very popular - I never saw so many serious
shuffleboard players on a ship! The gym was well used - there was a sign-up list for the 4 treadmills, 2
stairmasters and 3 bikes (maximum of 30 minutes) which worked well.
We only had 3 ports: 1)
Dakar, Senegal which I loved. Cunard was worried
about security and whether the local guides would meet their high standards and they were pleasantly
surprised. It's a lovely city - nice architecture, lots
of flowering bushes/trees, very active and bustling. The
tour guides spoke English very well and were informative. They
were frank about pickpockets and the vendors. No
problem for me, but I have common sense and acted the way I do in New York or London.
Some of the women were terrified and wouldn't get off the buses.
Ah well. 2) Tenerife, Canary Islands:
In port on Sunday, so some grousing that many shops/activities would be closed.
I stayed on board ship in great solitude. 3)Lisbon, Portugal:
Wonderful city. Didn't take any tours but
wandered around on my own. In general, I think Cunard's
excursions are the same quality as other cruise lines. All in all, I was disappointed with this trip (my 7th on QE2. Certainly Cunard's deep discounting in the UK resulted in a different type of passenger than normal and I see the Carnival mind-set encroaching (e.g. art auctions, inch of gold, higher priced drinks, etc.) Ask a Question About Cunard Line
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||