Go Back   Cruise Reviews Forums > Cruise Lines > Carnival Cruise Line
Register Forgot Password?
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  
Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:00 AM
billybuzzy's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,679
Unhappy More Problems For Carnival
Problems are not over for Carnival. The Press is now reporting that the Carnival Legend is slowly returning to the Port of Tampa after having problems with its azipod propulsion system. She is returning under her own power , all emergency and hotel systems are working.

BillyBuzzy
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 09:01 AM
Dave's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 17,747
Default
Carnival won't do it but I recall from my Marine air wing days that when problems started happening with regularity we had a standdown and secured flight operations, held safety meetings, and did nose-to-tail inspections of each airplane.
__________________
Dave
Editor, CruiseReviews.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 10:37 AM
billybuzzy's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,679
Default
Dave---The USAF pretty much follows the same sort of Flight Safety Review and, like the USMC, stands down as appropriate. Carnival claims to be implementing inspections but inspections and/or repairs/modifications are already too late.......the Corporate reputation has been affected.....I am sure that a fly on the wall is hearing some interesting things at Corporate Headquarters!!!

BillyBuzzy
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 11:25 AM
Dave's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 17,747
Default
Carnival executives were quite vague and even evasive in the quarterly earnings telecon this morning, when they were asked about funding for maintenance. During the Q & A session, financial analysts repeatedly tried to get Carnival to say how much they are spending on maintenance and safety. The Carnival people refused to break down the costs, giving only figures that included refurbishment costs. The Carnival financial people claimed they didn't have the details to address the question.

They reported that maintenance capital expenditures are running around $700 to $750 million, adding that as the average fleet age is getting older, ships need more maintenance. Here is one quote: "We forecast it to be in $800-plus million including refurbishments."
__________________
Dave
Editor, CruiseReviews.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 02:24 PM
PC GUY's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 354
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by billybuzzy View Post
Dave---The USAF pretty much follows the same sort of Flight Safety Review and, like the USMC, stands down as appropriate. Carnival claims to be implementing inspections but inspections and/or repairs/modifications are already too late.......the Corporate reputation has been affected.....I am sure that a fly on the wall is hearing some interesting things at Corporate Headquarters!!!

BillyBuzzy
If they are going to sack the CEO and senior management, then they should take a page out of Groupon's playbook. The severance package should be a voucher exchangeable for a 7 day cruise for up to 4 people in an inside cabin.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2013, 03:14 PM
Dave's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 17,747
Default
The nuclear power plant I worked at for 25+ years has had a history of highs and lows. The Browns Ferry fire was the worst nuclear incident in the U.S. until Three Mile Island. All three units were shut down the by the NRC in 1985 for design problems and management failures. We eventually recovered two units and became a top plant in the world ranking during the 1990s and early 2000s. Then the remaining unit was brought back on-line after a complete overhaul and pervasive problems started showing up.

We were getting complacent and had our minds more focused on keeping the megawatts online than in fixing things. Maintenance was deferred through legal means but we were just putting off problems. Quick fixes became the norm. It finally caught up to the plant right after I retired when the NRC put Unit 1 in what we call 'column four space'. Column one is regular NRC oversight, the plant is doing fine. It goes down from there to Column five, which is shutdown by order of the NRC. Column four means intense regulatory scrutiny and a huge recovery plan. I worked as part of the recovery team last year. Quite a massive undertaking where the plant had hundreds of us 'experts' under contracts worth millions of dollars, doing investigations and inspections, audits, observations, reviews of old records, corrective action reports ,etc. What we recommended was essentially taken as 'you will do this'. Now the plant says they are ready to exit Column four and the NRC will be officially reviewing everything we did and what the plant has done to 'change the culture'. This will take another several months.

I am beginning to think Carnival might be in their own 'column four space'.
__________________
Dave
Editor, CruiseReviews.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2013, 09:45 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 140
Default
Dave,

Do you think these things could be happening intentionally?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2013, 07:08 AM
Dave's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 17,747
Default
There is no conspiracy to destroy Carnival. If things were happening on one ship fairly often then the investigation might look for a disgruntled employee. But is there a ring of saboteurs spread out over the fleet? No.

People tend to look at recent events and forget what happened in the past. A few years ago Celebrity Cruises had propulsion problems almost monthly, and some times weekly, on all of their ships which used azipod propulsion. It went on for over a year. Dozens of cruises were affected in all.

In 2006 (7 years ago this coming Saturday) , Star Princess had a terrible fire that heavily damaged the port side of the ship and caused a guest to die from a stress-induced heart attack.

All of the Carnival incidents are unique. If there is a common cause it lies in something as mundane as a maintenance procedure or process that is used by every ship, or in a lack of rigor in the quality assurance processes at the shipyard for the newer ships. It is easy to point fingers at Fincantieri shipyard, but then you also need to consider Fincantieri has also built many of the Holland America and Princess ships currently in service. The latter cruise lines have had few to no problems. And despite what some reports say, not all Carnival ships were built by Fincantieri. The Fantasy and Spirit classes were built in Finland by Kvaerner.
__________________
Dave
Editor, CruiseReviews.com
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2013, 07:25 AM
Jim C.'s Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 5,113
Default
I'm sure the maintenance schedule will get revamped for sure. Cahill himself said the fuel line that caused the Triumph fire was in month 5 of the 6 months between inspections. Who wants to bet the new interval is like 3 months?

Airplanes don't fly for maintenance issues all the time, but no one reports it. The Dream could have sailed, but Carnival did the right thing by not risking sailing without the emergency generator. Now they are being barbecued in the media for it.. Its not right.
__________________
================================================== ==========
Carnival Cruise Lines:
Fantasy 90, Celebration 95, Victory 05, Conquest 05, Spirit 6/06, Freedom 6/08, Holiday 7/08, Victory 6/09, Valor 9/09, Dream 6/10, Splendor 8/10,Conquest 8/11,
Magic 11/11,Triumph 4/12,Spirit 7/12,Freedom 11/12, Triumph 2/13 - The fire cruise, Magic 1/14, Freedom x 2 6/14

NCL Dream October 2006, RCCL Mariner OTS June 2007, Celebrity Silhouette 2013
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2013, 07:50 AM
Dave's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 17,747
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim C. View Post
The Dream could have sailed, but Carnival did the right thing by not risking sailing without the emergency generator. Now they are being barbecued in the media for it.. Its not right.
Definitely a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario. If they had sailed I have absolutely no doubt the media would have been praying for the main engines to conk out hundreds of miles out to sea.
__________________
Dave
Editor, CruiseReviews.com
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
age, average, carnival, conquest, cruise, fleet, forums, freedom, issues, maintenance, problems

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carnival Dream having problems? Dave Carnival Cruise Line 26 03-19-2013 06:49 AM
Conquest problems???? or Carnival??? girlfrommarrs Carnival Cruise Line 10 06-03-2009 08:16 PM
Carnival website problems avenger Carnival Cruise Line 11 07-23-2007 07:28 AM
problems with excursions.......please help 4nzic1 Carnival Cruise Line 8 05-19-2005 09:13 PM


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
 

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Contact Us - Terms of Use - Cruise Reviews Home - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2