Go Back   Cruise Reviews Forums > Cruise Lines > Carnival Cruise Line
Register Forgot Password?
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  
Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 03:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Default
I just got word from my travel agent today that the Progreso port which was one of the stops on the honeymoon cruise my fiancee and I planned for August has been canceled. Apparently Carnival says that people wanted to stay longer in Cozumel so to keep their customers happy they would extend the stays in Cozumel beginning this week and eliminate Progreso. Now I know that cruise lines have the right to change the itinerary - but does their reason sound a little fishy to anyone else? I was looking forward to Progreso as I wanted to visit the ruins, but I will adjust. It just seems that Carnival may not be being really honest about why the change. Anyone know anything more or am I just being paranoid?
John
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 04:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Valley Center, CA 92082
Posts: 2,362
Default
Hmmm, I haven't heard a thing. Progreso is great for the ruins, but then if you have a longer stay i nCozumel, you can also get to the ruins on the mainland.

Tom
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2005, 05:57 PM
swimmersonboard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 494
Default
We took the Carnival Glory on that itinery and to be honest Progresso was ugly and there was not much there. It showed the how the natives lived but other than that it just wasn't much. I wish OUR trip had had longer in Cozumel!!! There are so many great excursions from that port. Don't worry you'll be happy with staying longer once you get there.
__________________
Carnival Freedom June 2009
Crown Princess March 2009
Carnival Glory January 2008
Naviagator of the Seas Mar 07
Sovereign of Seas Oct 06
Carnival Glory March 2005
Nordic Empress 1996
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 06:05 AM
NancyN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wickliffe, OH
Posts: 2,555
Default
Who Me,
Interestingly I have clients who are going to be on the Glory and had to inform them of the schedule change. I thought it was interesting also, but from all I have heard - Progreso is such an unpopular port stop - they made a decision that is in the best interest of the passengers.
Nancy
__________________

Free Cruise Tickers
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2005, 07:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 99
Default
I am in total agreement with Cyndi - I did not like Progreso at all!
__________________
Free Cruise Tickers
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2005, 06:06 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 16
Default
I wish they had cancelled the Progresso stop a few months earlier! The ONLY reasons for a cruise stop at Progresso are related to Mexican politics and a desire to extract a few more dollars from cruise passengers. There has never been a place more accurately described as a "tourist trap."

If you really want to visit the ruins, you can do so from Playa or Cozumel. Consider yourself lucky that they made the change!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2005, 03:59 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 21
Default
I am also one that wishes Progresso was cancelled a few months ago. I went on Glory in May and Progresso sucked. The ruins are nothing great.

I wish we had more time in Cozumel.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2005, 11:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
Default
Okay, based on the responses I guess the reasons for the change appear to be valid. I hate to admit that my fiancee was right - she insisted I was being paranoid.

Thanks for the feedback.
John
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2005, 10:55 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
Default
I've sailed on the "Glory" and the main reason for the stop at progresso is to visit Chichen Itza. The ruins there are spectacular and it is well worth the trip. It's much more spectacular than Tulum. However since only about 300 people per cruise take this excursion, that leaves 2500 at the end of a 4 mile long pier with nothing to do except visit a few tacky gift shops. (actually there are other excursions too.) I am planning a large group trip on the Glory Dec. 3. This is with Battlestar Galactica's Richard Hatch. Carnival's cancellation came as a big shock to us since the Chichen Itza trip was promoted as the highlite of our trip. They still have no explanation for the cancellation.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2005, 08:14 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 20
Default
You mean I might have the chance to meet one of my childhood idols on this cruise? Man it just keeps getting better, can't wait, this will be our second cruise.
 
Closed Thread

Tags
2005, carnival, cruise, fishing, glory, lines, merida, port, progreso, progresso, review, ships, stop, stopping, stops, sucks

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carnival cancels 5 more Splendor cruises because of fire damage Dave Carnival Cruise Line 1 12-15-2010 12:00 PM
Carnival Cancels Liberty in Europe 2009 etinca Carnival Cruise Line 6 11-02-2008 08:56 PM
Carnival Glory and Carnival Dream Change Cruise Fanatic Carnival Cruise Line 0 06-25-2008 02:24 PM
Carnival Glory or Carnival Destiny?? kj_connections Carnival Cruise Line 4 04-21-2007 05:35 PM
Carnival Cancels Miracle Summer Sailing bippytrip Carnival Cruise Line 0 06-08-2004 01:48 PM


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
 

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Contact Us - Cruise Reviews Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2