Well it looks as though the proposed revision is dead for the moment & it's great news for everyone, except NCL. I hope Princess reinstates the 15 day cruises to Hawaii now. I always suspected the proposed rule had something to do with their change to 14 days.
I may have to appoint you the forum news correspondent! Thanks for the link.
I am also pleased it was killed. It was obviously a train wreck from the beginning and I hope we don't hear about it again. Of course, this being an election year the new OMB (and there will be one regardless of who wins) may revisit the proposal. I sure hope not.
I'm with you thinking on that Dave, I have sailed with NCL in the past but after this fiasco I refuse to give them any more of my business - no matter what the outcome. Most people don't even know what's being proposed & don't realize how devastating it would be to the cruise industry as we know it today. I brought up the subject at a Captains lunch with the Princess Circle host & she was very well aware of the proposal. (many of the people at our table had never heard a word)
To take what Dave said a little further: If NCL thinks this will drive me to continue to do business with them, they are sadly mistaken. They may have lost a previously loyal, 15-year customer this time.
Not to pile on, or offend anyone, but they will lose me as a potential new customer too. I was considering the Majesty out of Charleston. I think they should reconsider the backlash from loyal cruisers of every brand that may have given them a try. I don't think they are in a position to be putting out any ill will. No amount of advertising would overcome the word of mouth from the cruising communities of all the brands if they follow through with this. We may not all cruise the same brands, but if this could impact our port choices....