Go Back   Cruise Reviews Forums > General Cruise Chat Questions > General Cruise Chat
Register Forgot Password?
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2002, 03:05 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4
My wife and I have booked a cruise on the upcoming October sailing of the Dawn Princess.

We found out but weren't notified of a cancelled port only after we paid in full. The port that Princess cancelled is that of Christmas Island which breaks up, which is now, over five straight days at sea. Not necessarily the most marketable idea at the price we paid for most cruise lines.

The reasons were that port damage prevented safe landing. I can buy that. But, read on. Apparently Princess knew about this alleged damage well before we paid our final payment, and initial deposit. This is based on gathered evidence and notes from other passengers. A bit distressing.

Agreeing with others who have posted on other message boards, it looks like Princess is forgoing this port for a completely different reason(s) than that of safety. My wife contacted Princess receiving the same response -- that port damage prevents the cruise line from landing safely on Christmas Island. This, apparently, is an untruth since Radisson Seven Seas is visiting and landing on the island in September and Orient lines is visiting and landing in December (confirmed).

We have also confirmed this information through a secondary source with the Kiritimati (Christmas Island) government. I quote, "The landing from the cruise ships' boats on Kiritimati Island is possible and the maintenance of the landing site has been done and the main channel will be dredged three times every month in advance prior Cruise arrival."

Princess replied they cannot speak for the other cruise lines. Do they mean to say the other cruise line's standards are less than Princess'? I, too, believe there is a cover-up on Princess' end.

On the surface, it appears Princess does not want to hassle with an island that does not generate revenue for them. If the goverment there indicates the port is safe and will continue to maintain that port with regard to safety, why else would Princess avoid such a port if it were not for profit?

Unfortunately, there may be nothing we can do because when the cruise lines say NO, how can you fight them? Their lawyers seem to have it covered. Personal Choice? Do they mean THEIR personal choice?

If you have any thoughts, information, evidence, "inside" information, advice, anything at all, please let us know.

Strength in numbers, I think. Thank you.


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2002, 05:38 AM
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 61
Deal with it. Cruise lines can and will change their iteneraries at any time.

Stan [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif[/img]
Closed Thread

2011, change, cruise, damage, dawn, emily, itenerary, itinerary, kiritimati, line, norwegian, october, princess, ship

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Itinerary change? Deege2424 Carnival Cruise Line 39 05-04-2009 10:12 AM
Change in itinerary Rissa Carnival Cruise Line 7 04-04-2007 09:45 AM
Change in itinerary SteveW Royal Caribbean Cruise Line 7 08-03-2006 06:57 PM
Dawn itinerary change JPWilSL Norwegian Cruise Line 1 03-09-2006 06:47 AM
ITINERARY CHANGE -- Dawn Princess in October. Comments? CJTraveller Princess Cruises 10 11-28-2002 07:05 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Contact Us - Terms of Use - Cruise Reviews Home - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2